Skip to main content

The Arizona Law and Immigrant Families

A little more than a week ago, a 36-year-old woman I’ll call Sonia Rivera answered a knock on the door of her downtown San Diego apartment. Agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) told Rivera they were searching for a Mexican man suspected of criminal activity, who an informant had told them could be found at their address.


After failing to find the subject of their search – Rivera insists she does not even know the man – the ICE agents asked Rivera to provide documents proving her legal residence in the United States. Unable to do so, Rivera was taken into custody, along with her three sons.

The next day Sonia Rivera and her two teenage sons were deported to Mexico. Her youngest son, an 8-year-old U.S. citizen, was released into the custody of relatives residing permanently (and legally) here in San Diego.

Another “mixed-status” family had been torn apart by the deportation of its undocumented members.

Sonia Rivera and her family were victims of what Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials call “collateral arrest.” They were not the target of a search, nor had they done anything specific to run afoul of the law. But ICE agents came across them in the course of doing their duties, and so subjected them to the full weight of their enforcement authority.

I cannot stop thinking about families like Sonia Rivera’s as I read the news about Arizona Senate Bill 1070. Signed into law by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer late last month and scheduled to go into effect by August, SB 1070 makes it a state crime for immigrants to be in Arizona without appropriate documentation issued by the federal government. The law also requires Arizona law enforcement officers to question people about their immigration status if there is “reasonable suspicion” that they are in the country illegally.

If the new Arizona law survives challenges in the courts, the most hurtful practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement will become codified as a systematic and ongoing priority for all of Arizona’s law enforcement personnel.

Arizona police officers and sheriffs will be required to make on-the-spot judgments about the immigration status of ordinary Arizonans – at routine traffic stops, while out walking the beat, when called to the scene of an emergency.

And because they will be subject to citizen complaints for their perceived failure to enforce the new law, agents of law enforcement will be incentivized to apprehend people unable to document their legal residence.

The “collateral” arrest of undocumented immigrants – and the breaking up of “mixed-status” families – will become standard operating procedure for the entire law enforcement community in a border state in which over one third of the population is of Mexican ancestry.

The Arizona law will be challenged in the courts, but the threat of its implementation is sending shock waves through immigrant communities across the nation, including here in San Diego.

If laws like Arizona SB 1070 become the new fad for politicians wanting to burnish their credentials as opponents of illegal immigration, Arizona will have laid a legal foundation to what for millions of American families will look and feel like a police state.

Most impartial observers estimate the number of people living in the United States without authorization at somewhere between 12 million and 16 million. But nobody knows how many of these millions share a home with family members fully entitled by U.S. law to reside here.

Champions of liberty and common human decency would do well to think ahead and anticipate the promotion of more legislation like Arizona SB 1070. And as we do, it would behoove us to ask whether it serves our nation’s best interests to dedicate our law enforcement officers to tearing apart families like Sonia Rivera’s.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE HUBRIS OF INCLUSION: Thoughts on the Future of the United Methodist Church

The United Methodist Church was born in a specific time and place, in the mid-twentieth century in the United States of America. Protestant denominations were ascendant, and with them a brand of "ecumenism" that would only decades later be recognized by those who championed it as culturally bound to the white "mainline." Mergers were all the buzz, including the one that created the UMC in 1968, and Methodists embraced their new denomination as partial fulfillment of a dream of "Christian unity." As the historian Robert Handy noted in his wonderful little 1971 book,  A Christian America: Protestant Hopes and Historical Realities , leaders of the new denomination thought of it as "a kind of unofficial national church." Because they sat at the midpoint of mainline American Protestantism in so many respects -- ecclesial, theological, liturgical -- it was easy for them to assume that as all churches became one, pretty much everyone else would eventua...

Methodism's Many Pasts and Futures

From the time the brothers John and Charles Wesley first convened a "holy club" of friends at Oxford University in 1729, Methodists have declared theirs a pursuit of “holiness” or “Christian perfection.”  For early Methodists, the pursuit of Christian perfection led inevitably to disagreements about what it meant to live a holy life.   As early as  1741 the Wesleys distanced themselves from their closest collaborator, George Whitefield, over his Calvinist teachings.  And while Wesley proclaimed himself to possess "a catholic spirit," his practices - not least, his own refusal to conform to the conventions of Anglican parish ministry - were widely perceived by his contemporaries to be divisive or even "schismatic." Methodism on the other side of the Atlantic retained this same spirit, which should come as little surprise since it was born in an act of separation - in 1784,  Wesley consecrated Thomas Coke as Superintendent, setting in motion the cre...

On the 40th Anniversary of Friendship Park

Imagine the First Lady of the United States punching a hole in the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.   Imagine her publicly lamenting that there was a border fence at all. In fact this scenario doesn’t need to be imagined … because it happened forty years ago right here in San Diego County.   The date was August 18, 1971 and the location was “Friendship Park,” the small cement plaza on the U.S.-Mexico border, at the southwest-most corner of the continental United States. The First Lady was Pat Nixon, who had been a prominent champion of our state’s public parks when her husband Richard Nixon was Governor of California, before being elected President of the United States.    She came to Friendship Park to inaugurate the surrounding area as California’s Border Field State Park.    After planting a tree as part of the inauguration ceremony, Mrs. Nixon approached the large stone monument which sits at the heart of Friendship Park.   The monument commemo...