Skip to main content

CRIMINALIZING FRONTERIZOS - Yet Another Lament

In Spanish, there is a word for people whose lives and family trees span the US-Mexico border: "fronterizos." The closest we can come in English is "borderlanders," but this word does not conjure the rich and painful history that the Spanish word suggests.
In the 1930s somewhere between 400,000 and 1 million Mexicans and Mexican-Americans returned to Mexico "by their own decision or through officially voluntary – though often coercive – repatriation programs directed by state and local governments and charitable aid agencies," this according to the USCIS. I know many people whose parents or grandparents were forcibly evicted in this way - in effect, they were deported without due process.

Now, eighty years later, according to the Washington Post, US federal authorities are sifting through the birth certificates of fronterizos born twenty, thirty, forty years ago and demanding that they provide corroborating documentation (hospital bills, rental agreements, etc.) to prove that their mothers were residing in the United States at the time of their birth.
This is just the latest initiative in a decades-long endeavor, directed by both Republican and Democratic administrations, to "harden the border," presumably as a precondition to more comprehensive immigration reform. "Enforcement, then reform" has been the mantra of US politicians from across the political spectrum. What this has meant on the US-Mexico border is "enforcement, then more enforcement, then more enforcement." What this has meant is more long, hard suffering for fronterizos.
The Trump Administration's policy of "zero tolerance" brings all this to a sad, and predictably Orwellian, conclusion. Unlike their compatriots, US citizens who live along the border can now be judged as inherently suspect by virtue of their place of birth.
I have spent a great deal of time across the last few decades trying to understand just a little bit about the lives of fronterizos. Many of you have generously taken the time to join me in this endeavor, and I thank you for sharing this spiritual exercise, for trying to walk a few short miles in the shoes of others.
Should you care to take one more step in this journey, I recommend this thought-experiment today: imagine that your livelihood, and your foothold on life in the only country you have ever known, depended on calling your mother and asking her if she has a paper trail from the prenatal care she received while she lovingly nurtured you in her womb.

photo credit: Maria Teresa Fernandez

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE HUBRIS OF INCLUSION: Thoughts on the Future of the United Methodist Church

The United Methodist Church was born in a specific time and place, in the mid-twentieth century in the United States of America. Protestant denominations were ascendant, and with them a brand of "ecumenism" that would only decades later be recognized by those who championed it as culturally bound to the white "mainline." Mergers were all the buzz, including the one that created the UMC in 1968, and Methodists embraced their new denomination as partial fulfillment of a dream of "Christian unity." As the historian Robert Handy noted in his wonderful little 1971 book,  A Christian America: Protestant Hopes and Historical Realities , leaders of the new denomination thought of it as "a kind of unofficial national church." Because they sat at the midpoint of mainline American Protestantism in so many respects -- ecclesial, theological, liturgical -- it was easy for them to assume that as all churches became one, pretty much everyone else would eventua...
3 comments
Read more

Methodism's Many Pasts and Futures

From the time the brothers John and Charles Wesley first convened a "holy club" of friends at Oxford University in 1729, Methodists have declared theirs a pursuit of “holiness” or “Christian perfection.”  For early Methodists, the pursuit of Christian perfection led inevitably to disagreements about what it meant to live a holy life.   As early as  1741 the Wesleys distanced themselves from their closest collaborator, George Whitefield, over his Calvinist teachings.  And while Wesley proclaimed himself to possess "a catholic spirit," his practices - not least, his own refusal to conform to the conventions of Anglican parish ministry - were widely perceived by his contemporaries to be divisive or even "schismatic." Methodism on the other side of the Atlantic retained this same spirit, which should come as little surprise since it was born in an act of separation - in 1784,  Wesley consecrated Thomas Coke as Superintendent, setting in motion the cre...
2 comments
Read more

On the 40th Anniversary of Friendship Park

Imagine the First Lady of the United States punching a hole in the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.   Imagine her publicly lamenting that there was a border fence at all. In fact this scenario doesn’t need to be imagined … because it happened forty years ago right here in San Diego County.   The date was August 18, 1971 and the location was “Friendship Park,” the small cement plaza on the U.S.-Mexico border, at the southwest-most corner of the continental United States. The First Lady was Pat Nixon, who had been a prominent champion of our state’s public parks when her husband Richard Nixon was Governor of California, before being elected President of the United States.    She came to Friendship Park to inaugurate the surrounding area as California’s Border Field State Park.    After planting a tree as part of the inauguration ceremony, Mrs. Nixon approached the large stone monument which sits at the heart of Friendship Park.   The monument commemo...
Post a Comment
Read more