Skip to main content

It's All Connected - thoughts on the Total Eclipse of the Sun

As suggested by the "man of signs," which appeared in early American almanacs straight through to the end of the eighteenth century, people living before the triumph of modern science believed that everything was somehow, mysteriously, connected.  Individual bodies, churches ("the body of Christ"), communities and nations ("bodies politic") and heavenly bodies - our ancestors saw these many bodies as nested one inside the other, like Russian dolls.
Benjamin Franklin,
Poor Richard's Almanac, 1733
The man of signs came to my mind as I watched friends from across the United States react to the total eclipse of the sun this past Monday.  People within the "band of totality" described the experience in visceral, bodily terms.  Hearts beat faster, palms grew clammy. Inexplicably, and uncontrollably, people laughed and cried and shouted.

Of course we understand a lot more than our ancestors did about how each of these different bodies actually function.  But we are also prone to think of ourselves as isolated individuals, cut off from others, cut off from the cosmos, and in this I think we are the more ignorant.

Many scientists find truth in the ancient notion that we are deeply connected to the world around us. Some theologians think of the cosmos as God's body, a vast body within which we all live and move and have our being. Today's science tells us human beings are a carbon-based life form, and I am reminded of the ancient funeral liturgy: you are dust and to dust you shall return.

How would it change us, if we lived our lives as if we were truly connected to the world around us?  Wouldn't we be more gentle with each other, even those with whom we disagree?  Wouldn't we be slow to judge, and quick to forgive? Wouldn't we be less likely to draw hard boundaries between "us" and  "them"?

I think of this as I reflect on the week, now passed. 

I groan at our President's casual injections of bile and animus and division into our body politic. I want to tell my children - I want to tell all children - "Don't mind him. Turn him off. He is not good for you. He is not worthy of you."

But I also think of the lunch I had the other day, with someone I can now call friend.  We disagreed about politics, but we liked each other, and enjoyed each other's company.  He respected me.  I respected him.  We prayed over lunch.  We ate together.  We were connected. We still are. 

The eclipse brought us all together this week, if only for a moment, and reminded us of a deep and abiding truth: it's all connected. Perhaps we should cast more than an occasional glance at the heavens?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE HUBRIS OF INCLUSION: Thoughts on the Future of the United Methodist Church

The United Methodist Church was born in a specific time and place, in the mid-twentieth century in the United States of America. Protestant denominations were ascendant, and with them a brand of "ecumenism" that would only decades later be recognized by those who championed it as culturally bound to the white "mainline." Mergers were all the buzz, including the one that created the UMC in 1968, and Methodists embraced their new denomination as partial fulfillment of a dream of "Christian unity." As the historian Robert Handy noted in his wonderful little 1971 book,  A Christian America: Protestant Hopes and Historical Realities , leaders of the new denomination thought of it as "a kind of unofficial national church." Because they sat at the midpoint of mainline American Protestantism in so many respects -- ecclesial, theological, liturgical -- it was easy for them to assume that as all churches became one, pretty much everyone else would eventua...
3 comments
Read more

Methodism's Many Pasts and Futures

From the time the brothers John and Charles Wesley first convened a "holy club" of friends at Oxford University in 1729, Methodists have declared theirs a pursuit of “holiness” or “Christian perfection.”  For early Methodists, the pursuit of Christian perfection led inevitably to disagreements about what it meant to live a holy life.   As early as  1741 the Wesleys distanced themselves from their closest collaborator, George Whitefield, over his Calvinist teachings.  And while Wesley proclaimed himself to possess "a catholic spirit," his practices - not least, his own refusal to conform to the conventions of Anglican parish ministry - were widely perceived by his contemporaries to be divisive or even "schismatic." Methodism on the other side of the Atlantic retained this same spirit, which should come as little surprise since it was born in an act of separation - in 1784,  Wesley consecrated Thomas Coke as Superintendent, setting in motion the cre...
2 comments
Read more

On the 40th Anniversary of Friendship Park

Imagine the First Lady of the United States punching a hole in the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.   Imagine her publicly lamenting that there was a border fence at all. In fact this scenario doesn’t need to be imagined … because it happened forty years ago right here in San Diego County.   The date was August 18, 1971 and the location was “Friendship Park,” the small cement plaza on the U.S.-Mexico border, at the southwest-most corner of the continental United States. The First Lady was Pat Nixon, who had been a prominent champion of our state’s public parks when her husband Richard Nixon was Governor of California, before being elected President of the United States.    She came to Friendship Park to inaugurate the surrounding area as California’s Border Field State Park.    After planting a tree as part of the inauguration ceremony, Mrs. Nixon approached the large stone monument which sits at the heart of Friendship Park.   The monument commemo...
Post a Comment
Read more