Skip to main content

Of Jeremiah and Jeremiads (Opinion)

Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of Barack Obama’s home church on the south side of Chicago, knows a thing or two about preaching. It’s clear the aptly-named Reverend Wright understands there is a place in the pulpit for righteous anger.

A “jeremiad” is a spoken or written work lamenting the state of society and cautioning the powers that be to change their ways. The name is derived from the Biblical prophet Jeremiah, who foretold the collapse of the Kingdom of Judah for having broken covenant with God.

Reverend Wright has come under attack for two jeremiads in particular. In a 2003 sermon at the Trinity United Church of Christ, Wright preached this: “The government gives them drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God bless America.’ No, no, no, not God bless America. God damn America, that’s in the Bible, for killing innocent Americans. God damn American for treating our citizens as less than human.”

Critics – white critics, to be more precise – are expressing shock (shock!) that a black preacher would describe America’s treatment of poor black men as damnable. Presumably the good Reverend should have been more nuanced in his expression.

I am sure the critics would not dispute the facts. America was built on the backs of African and African-American slaves. The struggles for abolition and civil rights cost inordinate amounts of blood. Racism remains a persistent feature of the American cultural landscape.

But the critics would have had Jeremiah Wright preach that these things are … what? Regrettable? Unfortunate? The gall of the man, to say that American racism is damnable.

The other jeremiad for which Reverend Wright is being pilloried is one in which he asserted that the 9/11 attacks on New York represented American “chickens coming home to roost.”

Perhaps the metaphor is too complex for Reverend Wright’s critics to understand?

Americans may like to pretend that they are a peace-loving people, but the historical record is clear. Throughout its history the United States has sought military solutions to international problems. (For a 90-second video summarizing the history of American military involvements see www.mapsofwar.com.)

Should a nation which routinely intervenes in the affairs of other nations expect never to come under attack itself?

Reverend Wright is guilty of good “exegesis.” He takes Biblical passages, extracts from them their essence, and applies them creatively to contemporary problems. That he does so sometimes in the context of a “jeremiad” is not to be condemned. It is to be commended.

Most preachers are afraid to say frankly what they really think the Bible says. They are afraid because they know that if they say what they really think the Bible says, they will catch hell from churchgoers who disagree with them. What results is “least common denominator” preaching, preaching which never gives anyone offense.

Some churches – some black churches, especially – have done a better job than others of maintaining a tradition known as “freedom of the pulpit.” The idea is that when it comes to the Sunday sermon, preachers should feel free to call things as they see them. Through prayer and study and self-discipline preachers can hope that the way they see things comes into line with the way God sees things.

Do preachers always get it right? Of course not.

But here is one vote for hoping that preachers across America don’t stop trying. And here’s one vote for hoping that the current controversy that swirls around Reverend Wright doesn’t forever banish jeremiads from American pulpits.

God forbid that America’s preachers end up sounding like her politicians.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE HUBRIS OF INCLUSION: Thoughts on the Future of the United Methodist Church

The United Methodist Church was born in a specific time and place, in the mid-twentieth century in the United States of America. Protestant denominations were ascendant, and with them a brand of "ecumenism" that would only decades later be recognized by those who championed it as culturally bound to the white "mainline." Mergers were all the buzz, including the one that created the UMC in 1968, and Methodists embraced their new denomination as partial fulfillment of a dream of "Christian unity." As the historian Robert Handy noted in his wonderful little 1971 book,  A Christian America: Protestant Hopes and Historical Realities , leaders of the new denomination thought of it as "a kind of unofficial national church." Because they sat at the midpoint of mainline American Protestantism in so many respects -- ecclesial, theological, liturgical -- it was easy for them to assume that as all churches became one, pretty much everyone else would eventua

On the 40th Anniversary of Friendship Park

Imagine the First Lady of the United States punching a hole in the fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.   Imagine her publicly lamenting that there was a border fence at all. In fact this scenario doesn’t need to be imagined … because it happened forty years ago right here in San Diego County.   The date was August 18, 1971 and the location was “Friendship Park,” the small cement plaza on the U.S.-Mexico border, at the southwest-most corner of the continental United States. The First Lady was Pat Nixon, who had been a prominent champion of our state’s public parks when her husband Richard Nixon was Governor of California, before being elected President of the United States.    She came to Friendship Park to inaugurate the surrounding area as California’s Border Field State Park.    After planting a tree as part of the inauguration ceremony, Mrs. Nixon approached the large stone monument which sits at the heart of Friendship Park.   The monument commemorates the first meeting of the U.S

Here Come the Brides

Sidney and Diane met at an April Fool’s Day party in 2006.   They began dating the next day and fell in love.   They weren’t quite ready to get married in the summer of 2008, when California was granting marriage licenses to same-sex couples.    They told me they hadn’t wanted to get married “just because they could,” and while they were (of course) opposed to California's Proposition 8 , they weren’t looking to make a political statement with their nuptials. By year-end 2008, however, Sidney and Diane had reached a decision.   They loved each other.   They wanted to spend their lives together.   They knew that the State of California wouldn’t give them a marriage license but they wanted to get married anyway.    They wanted a wedding for their families, for their friends, for each other. As I sat with Sidney and Diane through our pre-marital sessions, I saw the tenderness and respect with which they treated each other, the true delight they took in each other’s comp